Brian Grubb of Reading Pennsylvania writes:

I won and lost!!!

I was charged with exceeding the maximum speed limit--73 in a 55--but they reduced it to 63 in a 55, less in fines, plus the judge said that he would not submit the points to PADOT so I paid $45.00.

I won simply because I learned so much from your material.

The judge said he never had someone so prepared for a case and he thought it was impressive and I was honest.

The officer and the judge both asked me where I got the information and I told them from a friend. Thanks for everything and I will certainly pass the word on about your web site. Please do not refund my money. I am just glad you helped me and I actually won in some way.

Thanks again.

Brian Grubb
Reading, PA

Allen Crimmins of Portland Oregon wrote:

Mike, after I explained this was an illegal speed trap location, the laser gun could not be deemed accurate, I was traveling in the slow lane (which the officer admitted) my case was dismissed.

I was prepared and I do not think the Officer knew what was happening as it unraveled before the Judge. I attribute my confidence in court to your information. It helped level the table.

Funny thing is, the guy before me got a $500.00 fee imposed for going 100 mph at the same location by the same officer, and he changed his plea to "Guilty", but the Judge threw the book at him and imposed the full fine - PERIOD. Thanks for your help!

Allen Crimmins
Portland, Oregon

Mark Theberge of Massachusetts wrote:

Good morning Mike, just letting you know that I was just found NOT RESPONCIBLE for my speeding violation thanks to the tips and strategies that you gave me. I was a little scared due to the fact that the ticket was for 120 in a 65, but never the less, by using the questions and preparing certain areas that I highlighted in your packet I was found not guilty. (Or maybe the judge just got lucky the night before, after all, it was just Valentines Day. Ha Ha) thanks again, Mark Theberge

Mark Theberge, Massachusetts

Jeff Gilliland of New York wrote:

Mike, Your system was really helpful and informative. I actually never went to trial because the officer pulled me off into another room, I assume because he was a little nervous about what I had. He wanted me to agree to failure to obey a traffic control device (same fine with 2 points), same thing the DA agreed to, but I said, .I.ll agree to no seat belt or we can go in front of the judge". I explained to him that there is no current engineering study, the only study available is 23 years old and the 85th percentile speed is 33.9 MPH (explained posting should be 35 not 30 MPH), and that all this makes the current posted speed illegal. Therefore radar enforcement is illegal, hence SPEED TRAP. He then proceeded to tell me that he was not required to bring the engineering study, calibration logs or any information of that sort. I then told him that may be true but if I requested that he bring this information to court that he was required to (I requested all this information though the DA). I then showed him the case laws and MUTCD guidelines that I was going to present to the court; he was absolutely clueless to all this information. Ultimately he agreed to no seat belt.

Thank You, I will suggest to anyone who gets a speeding ticket to use your system because it does work. I did a lot a research outside of what you said and found that you said to be absolutely true. In fact I found a newspaper article on the internet just two days ago, about how this city's speeding tickets are unenforceable because the engineering study does not support the road's posted speed limit. I guess it's nice to know that some places actually know and follow the law.

Thanks Again,
Jeff Gilliland
Mechanical/Project Engineer

Hi Mike,

I got the case dismissed because the officer was a no show! Thank you so much for all of your help. I was fully confident I was going to get it dismissed anyway with your TicketKiller system. I think you'd make a great attorney, if you ever decided to pursue it. You have a good heart and I'm sure a wonderful person. Take good care and thanks again.

Karen Sandler of eureka Calif.

Charles Tassin of Maryland writes:

Hi Mike,

I went to court yesterday. My case was at the top of the docket. He wanted to process the people that wanted to plead guilty first and have a trial for the people who wanted to plead not guilty. Of course, I plead not guilty after the first roll call, the judge came back to me. After the first so called trial he probably was not excited to see me again. He looked like an idiot after the first trial because of his lack of knowledge of speed surveys, case laws, MUTCD laws and regulations and etc. The case was dismissed.

Personally, I don't think a district court judge in Maryland would really want to hear a case like this one and make a decision. It is easier to sweep it under the rug. This case was something of an indictment against the Howard County Traffic Engineer Division for a 11 year old survey. The county last August had received a grant from the state to write citations because of the start of school. By the way, there were no schools anywhere near this location. The officer had a quota to fill to keep his boss happy.

Maybe one day, Maryland will quit playing games with the speed limit.

Thank you for all your assistance,

Charles Tassin

Nancy Klementich of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania wrote:

Thank you very much.

I went to court today with all my reasons for the ticket to be dismissed. The policeman was there. However, the prosecutor decided to drop the charge!

Thank you for getting me "armed" with good information.

Nancy Klementich

Thomas Vrchota of Phoenix, Arizona writes:

Mike thanks for your help.

I had a no show-which of course meant the case was dismissed-but reading your info gave me the confidence to go into an intimidating environment with a moderate amount of confidence.

Thanks again

Tom

Andy of California wrote:

Mike, I filed a trial by written declaration in California on February 28. It took the court 2 1/2 months to respond, but I just got the letter today. NOT GUILTY!

"The court finds that the engineering and traffic survey does not support a posted speed limit of 35MPH".

Thanks for the Ticket Killer system! Andy

Amit Johar of Scottsdale AZ wrote:

Hi. I would like to give you an update of my case. I won in court yesterday! The speed survey defense worked. I visited other ticket fighting sites and if i had used their strategies, I would have lost the case. With 85th percentile speed being 60 mph and posted limit being 45 mph was more than enough to get the ticket. Thanks a lot!

Amit

Del Mathis of Virginia writes:

Dear Mike:

My court date was today. I used your strategies. In Montgomery County, VA they have traffic court down to a well organized event. It is impossible to schedule something on the officer's day off. However, they did not have a "speed study" and my case was dismissed. I am unsure if the judge believed my argument or grew weary of all the information I presented him with.

After reviewing your information and the facts and location of my ticket I am convinced they are operating a speed trap. Thanks for your help and the extra effort you made to re-send the docs.

Bob Severns and Becky Chineworth of Oregon wrote:

I purchased the ticket killer system in 2003 because I had been ticketed on an interstate freeway for going the same speed I had been driving every day for 4 years. I used the Ticketkller System, and beat the ticket. This winter, my wife was ticketed in a small town near our home. Today, we used the Ticketkiller System again and beat this one too. I believe in this system. You have to follow it carefully, but it works.

Bob Severns-Becky Chineworth
Oregon

F. B. (name withheld on request) of Washington wrote:

Hi,

I used your system and kicked some ___. I prepped the way you said to, did all my homework and the backwoods bumpkins just sat there staring at me. They asked for a continuance and came back a month later with a speed survey from 1978 and a smile. Of course, I hit them with the 5 year rule and he stared at the floor before the magistrate found me not responsible.

I sent the FOIA request for information on the radar unit and officer but they still haven't responded (3 months later) so I have my congressman looking into that. I want to slam their faces into the ground. The magistrate offered the officer the right to an appeal. he looked at the 6 inch pile of paper on my desk and said he "couldn't appeal because he wouldn't have the time to research everything I had".

Your system works.

Thanks

No names please but thanks

Don of Massachusetts writes:

Thanks, I won! You're system is great.

Don

Ron Green of Ohio wrote:

It worked the officer never showed up thanks to your first strategy. THANKS,

The prosecutor said that they did not need a speed survey because Ohio state wide speed is 55 mph

He was wrong! It worked... dismissed!

RFG

Ty Wigal of Palmyra Virginia writes:

Hello Mr. Hohlweg,

Thank you for the email. I went to court today without the survey. The county government has been unable to produce it. The judge was not happy, but I argued that this document is required by Federal guidelines and should be public knowledge according to the Freedom of Information Act. I gave him the name of the person that was unable to find the document. Additionally, the judge wanted to proceed with the seat belt citation that I was given. I argued that the radar ticket was illegal and the seatbelt was .fruit of the poison tree. as your system taught me. The victory was very gratifying. These local scoundrels caught me in a "cherry patch" as you call it. I am going to dismantle it. Thank you for your service, fighting the good fight is well worth it.

Ty

M.T. (name withheld on request) of Pennsylvania wrote:

Mike, you can increase your percentages because of this story...

I reviewed your information and used what I learned in front of the judge. It worked.

Basically, the LEO immediately wanted to push me into traffic school, for which I was eligible. I asked him for a current engineering report. He told me that the bailiff had it. I went to the bailiff and asked for it. The bailiff gave me a "are you kiddin' me??" look and sent me back to the citing officer. I once again asked him if he had a valid engineering report. He mumbled something.

We went before the judge. The charge was "unsafe speed." (Presumably with radar documentation)

Judge asks for LEO's case. Deputy says, "Your honor, I have: A current calibration report on my radar device. I have a current training record indicating my capability to use the radar gun. I do not have an engineering report."

Judge looks at me and says, "Do you understand the charge against you?"

"Well, I understand the charge to be "unsafe speed, and in light of the testimony offered by the deputy, I'd like to move for dismissal," says I.

Judge says, "Motion granted."

Thanks for your help. You have another devotee. I tell all of my friends about your website.

M.T.

R.J. Romine of California wrote:

Mike,

Just wanted to drop you a line and let you know that your system worked for me and got my ticket dismissed. It took me about 4 hours to prepare and to get the proper info needed for court but when I went in for the bench trial the prosecutor asked me if I was looking to get court supervision and I told her no that I was looking to get the ticket dismissed and she asked for what reason and I told her about the speed survey and the limit was posted improperly and I had the documentation to prove it and that I wanted a trial on those facts. Well she left the room for about 10 minutes and came back and said I could leave that they are dismissing the charges. Armed with this new information about the speeding ticket revenue mill, I will fight any future ticket I may get.

Thanks for the help

RJ Romine

Jim Manalisay of Dublin California wrote:

Here's my testimonial:

TicketKiller.com was a great help to me. The information was easy to understand even for someone like me who is unfamiliar with law terminology. There were many ways to defend the speeding citation I received and ways even to raise the chances of the officer not even showing up to testify. I'm really glad I got the package. I recommend it to everyone! It won the case for me and saved me 8 times the in cost paying the ticket or doing traffic school! Thank you for making something so valuable for me to use now and again in the future.

Jim Manalisay

Erik, (did not give State) wrote:

On Jan 25, 2006, at 2:30 PM

I bought your system. I changed the date of the court date from the one they originally gave me and the cop never showed. Thanks for your help.

Sincerely,
Erik

Harold, (did not give State) wrote:

HELLO-

I JUST WENT TO COURT THIS AFTERNOON- TO ASK FOR ANOTHER DATE - AT FIRST THE STATES ATTORNEY OFFERED SUPERVISION AND A 100.00 DOLLAR COST- I DECLINED AND TOLD HIM I WAS JUST ASKIING THE JUDGE FOR MORE TIME TO PREPARE FOR THE CASE - THE STATES ATTORNEY THEN OFFERED SUPERVISION - NO COST - I ACCEPTED IT--

I WILL STILL LOOK UP MORE FROM YOU INFO TO PREPARE FOR ANY FUTURE CASE - THANKS AGAIN

I DO NOT REGRET THE COST FOR YOUR INFO AS IT MADE ME A LITTLE BOLDER FOR COURT - AND TO STAND MY GROUND

THANKS AGAIN

HAROLD

Derric Haynie (did not give state) writes:

So I won the case. Apparently both officers didn't show up after one had been penciled in to the docket. The judge said they sent in a letter saying that they wouldn't be there and the case should be dismissed. I find it hard to believe that they both couldn't be there so I can only believe that the officers knew they were breaking the law and didn't want me to prove that the speed limit sign on the street i got pulled over on, was illegal. Thanks for all your help, I'm using my case and all its preparations to fight my roommates case on the 18th. And obviously I won't need a refund.

Derric Haynie

P.S. I forgot to mention; as I left the courtroom, two attorneys followed me out and asked for copies of my brief.

Tony Smith of Tennessee writes:

Hi Mike

Here's an update: I went to court on Wednesday. This is the second time I've been to court on this ticket. The first time, there was no prosecutor and I submitted a motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute. The judge decided to pass the case for two weeks, despite my objection that no prosecutor was present to move the court for a continuance or object to my motion for dismissal.

Anyway, on Wednesday the prosecutor gives his little dog and pony show, which amounts to "Did you use radar on the defendant and are you trained to use radar." Of course, deputy dawg now has his little xeroxed certificate that confirms he has 8 hours of training on radar and laser, and the certifications for both tuning forks -- he didn't have those with him 2 weeks ago. After this, the prosecution rested and it was my turn.

For the benefit of the gallery, I grilled the cop on radar for 15 minutes and, I think, pretty well exposed him for a fool and a liar. He testified that the reason he would not allow me to see the radar when I requested to do so was because he carried "extra tactical weapons" in his patrol vehicle and he wasn't about to endanger himself or his partner by allowing a citizen to examine the evidence he used as the basis of his stop.

Finally, I dropped the bomb and asked the corporal whether he had brought the speed survey to court with him. At this, the cop, the judge and the prosecutor snapped to attention. I grilled the cop for about another 10 minutes on this subject, revealing for all present he had no idea what I was talking about.

I finished my examination of the witness and made my case. It was a thing of beauty (and I recorded every minute of it); they never saw it coming and they never knew what hit them. The judge stuttered and stammered and said "This is certainly the most novel defense I've ever seen." I replied that the law is never novel, it is only the law. The court tried to wriggle out by saying it was a court of facts, not a court of law. I responded that this was a matter of law and the facts were important only as evidence to ascertain whether the law had been broken.

The funny thing is that the prosecution never objected to anything I said.

I submitted a 15-page Pleading and Motion to Dismiss, along with the cases you included in your case law library. I've never felt so good. They hated letting me off but they had no choice. Thanks

Crystal Muse (did not give state) wrote:

Mike

I just wanted to thank you for your response and help. I did buy the product so that I would be prepared just in case I needed to be.

But it was not necessary. What I did was I sent a fax to the court letting them know that I requested that they keep my trial date. Due to the fact that I had called them inquiring prior to receiving your email. So what I did in my fax was basically state what you had said in regards to not letting them off the hook on my trial date. Kinda in short words I was alot more detailed in my reasoning but you get the idea. And the judge denied the courts request for continuance. So I had my court appearance today.

I went in prepared with your information and ready to go to trial. The da brought me into talk to me, stated their case I told them what I felt in regards to what happened. They responsed with a question if I had any outstanding tickets in NY I stated no this was the only ticket outstanding I had. And she said case dismissed.

The easiest thing, I was so amazed. There for only 30 minutes, was prepared to be there all day. But just wanted to thank you cause your response was what allowed me to send the fax to them requesting the deny the request for continuance. And by doing that they knew that the police officer was not going to be there due to his vacation and they knew they had to dismiss it.

Thank You

Crystal Muse

Frank Morrill of Fairfield, CA wrote:

Mike,

It has been a long slow process but we finally won our speeding case (RADAR) on appeal. After 3 lower courts we finally got to the appeal court where even the prosecutor had to agree that the speed survey had been poorly done. This was the first case they are aware of where the survey was challenged and not stand up. Thanks for all your help.

Frank Morrill

Les of Collin County Texas wrote:

Mike,

CASE DISMISSED.

My ticket citation stated Collin County; court was set in Dallas County. Officer came "loaded/prepared" with all documentation with regard to certification of radar and it's accuracy. Before the trial, both the prosecutor and the judge tried to convince me to plea out with a 180 probation. If no "incident in the next 180 days, then there would be no record. The fine to be assessed for the plea was $175.00 versus the $250.00 fine that was cited for speeding in a school zone. The prosecutor would not accept a plea to take this to a non-moving violation, no probation, and a similar fine of $175. I decided to stand trail.

Thought you would like to know that my ticket was dismissed.

Regards,
Les

Tina Peterson of Florida writes:

Thank you ticket killer for everything. I purchased your E book on trial by mail to fight my speeding ticket and received the courts decision on 7/6/07. My Case was Dismissed!!! I had purchased another E book but yours is by far the better of the two and am very thankful for everything. I used the cities speed survey and hammered the calibration of the radar as my defense.

I am 100% satisfied and will refer others to you in the future.

Thanks Again!

Sincerely,
Tina Peterson

Jerry Rose (former police officer) now from Hayden Lake Idaho wrote:

Hello Mike,

I wanted to let you know how my wife's ticket turned out.

To my surprise, after entering a "not guilty" plea, we were scheduled for a pre-trial conference with the prosecutor. This was unbelievable, as all of my former experiences went directly to a trial date. I found that only about 5% of folks here fight tickets. Anyway, I had tons of time to prepare using your materials. I had to do a formal records request from the City Clerk of the City of Hayden -- the contract city patrolled by the sheriff. About 6 years ago, the city council passed an ordinance lowering the speed limit on all residential streets from 35 to 25. Yup. You guessed right, no traffic survey was done. I also checked with the local Idaho DOT office. No survey there either.

Based on my wife's driving record, he was willing to amend the complaint to a "civil offense" (another weird local custom) and assess a $100 fine. I insisted he look at the notebook of documentation I had assembled. I started with the lack of survey -- "fruit from the poisoned tree" argument and explained the MUTCD regulations. After flipping through a few pages, he said that I was very well-prepared and willingly dismissed my wife's 40/25 radar ticket. There were eight others at the pre-trial. Of the nine (6 were for radar), 7 took the "civil penalty" deal, paid the higher fine, but kept a mover off their record, one decided to go to trial and mine was the only dismissal.

Thanks for your well-researched book, Mike. I couldn't have done it without you.

Best regards,
Jerry Rose
Inglewood P.D., retired
Hayden Lake, Idaho

David Williams (a CDL driver) of Brooksville, Florida

Went to court all prepared to fight with your system. Had found out the city thought the county surveyed the road and the county hadn't done it since 1969. As the traffic engineer for the county said it was not a radar survey. When I went to the city there engineers told me they had to photo copy my ticket to give me a copy of the survey then told me I had to go to the county for it. Seems the city engineers sent the photo copy to the city attorney's office. When I got to the check in window they again tired to fake me out with the statement .the officer has arrived, do you still want to go to court. I said yes I did. When we got in court the judge asked if I understood the charges I said yes. He then asked the officer to proceed at which time the officer said I would ask the court to dismiss this ticket as we do not have a recent traffic survey for Woodbury rd. The judge laughed and said .we DON'T HAVE A SURVEY FOR WOODBURY ROAD. How old is the one you have the officer didn't know so I told him it was dated 1969 your honor. He said case dismissed and that was the end. I assume the city attorney sent the officer a memo telling him to have it dismissed it. Thanks again with out your system I would not have known how to fight this system. It would appear that the city has all these cops writing tickets all over thinking that a large percentage of the people will either go to traffic school or just pay the fine, which would be a win for them either way. Your system rocks, because I have a class A license I have to protect it for my job. Thanks for the excellent help.

David

Steve Benson of Yamhill county Oregon wrote:

I won!!! thanks for everything!

I can't say enough good things about Ticket Killer it is definitely the way to beat your speeding ticket. Ticket Killer has more info than any other site of its kind and the principals WORK!! Don't go to court until you have this info!! Thanks Mike! Thanks to Ticket Killer I now have an extra $141 I don't have to pay for my ticket plus at least $50 a month for the next 3 years savings on my insurance!!! Thanks again, Steve Benson Yamhill County Oregon

David Conn of Boston Massachusetts lost his case originally but won on appeal using our techniques. He writes:

Hi Mike

First I had a pre-trial deal with a Mass State trooper who was not the citation giving trooper, and a clerk magistrate, I failed on that one as they did not want to hear my story, or figured I had no real defense then I hooked up with your advice and I had the regular hearing in Dorchester District Court where the violation occurred (jurisdiction) Unfortunately a woman MA State trooper and a woman judge did not like my argument and added a $100 head injury fund penalty to my $100 ticket So, I paid $185 and filed an appeal in Boston Municipal Court Appellate div., the female Ma State Trooper did not appear, but it was NOT summarily dismissed, instead the black female judge required that I plead my case, which was a surprise to me, and I fumbled thru it, but managed to get my points across, she said I would be notified by mail. After waiting about 8 weeks I finally received a notice of dismissal finding in my favor. This was a 1 year process, but worth it in the end. Thanks to you also Mike for your direction and the extensive case laws and sample briefs proved to be the ammunition I needed to pull out the win, keep up the good work too!

David

Aaron Samson of Santa Monica, California won his case and wrote:

I Had my Court date yesterday. I was driving in the heart of Santa Monica clocked at 67 in a 35. My cop showed up--but one of the other cops who was listed on the same ticket wasn't there. I used Ticket Killers strategy and asked for an immediate dismissal before the first cop could even open his mouth, claiming that my defense relied on the cross examination of that officer. Case Dismissed! $350.00 is being sent back to me and no points on my record!

Thanks TK!,
Aaron

Alex (no state given) wrote:

Thanks man!

I won. the policeman did not come at 9am as should. I raised my hand 9:05am to let the Judge know, but the judge did not acknowledge my presence or talk to me.

I then talked prosecutor at 9:30am and asked to dismiss my case; she said that my time will come 2 hours later (11:30am) and if the Policeman is not there by then, then it will be dismissed. I told her that the policeman was subpoena to be here by 9am not 11:30am.. But she did not care. So I went to someone else (who signed me in) out side the court room, and complained. she talked to a different prosecutor and got it dismissed.

I WON because of your tip for requesting a dismissal and pushing for it. Though, was the judge supposed to give me attention if I raised my hands between proceedings?

Thanks,
Alex

TicketKiller, I have purchased your product in the past and have won when I got a city speeding ticket. I forget if the system can help with tickets issued by state police, not local, on state highways (like I-69 in Indiana). If it does I would like to purchase the system for a second time. Please let me know ASAP.

Sincerely,
Chip Adams

Todd, who is currently a Deputy Sheriff in California wrote:

Around the beginning of July 2006 my wife received a speeding ticket. It was her first time pulling a camp trailer with our Ford Expedition and had been given bad information about having to drive 55 MPH as opposed to 65 MPH for everyone else. The CHP Officer that pulled her over subsequently cited her for the WRONG section, resulting in an additional $200.00 in fines. I ordered your Ticketkiller manual and found it contained tons of useful information that applied to my specific situation including the arbitrary nature of the "trailer pulling" speed limit, MUTCD, speed surveys and requesting a Trial by Declaration. I requested a Trial by Declaration from the court and all of the necessary papers for my case. I even ordered a traffic survey and used discovery to obtain the Officers notes (He would not tell my wife HOW he obtained her speed during the stop). I applied all of this information for my case and won! The charge was dismissed and my $350.00 was refunded. Thanks so much Ticketkiller I could not have done it without you!

Please do not use my last name as I am a Deputy Sheriff and it would be bad for business!

Sincerely,
Todd

Brian of Boston, Massachusetts writes:

Thanks again for the info. I have to tell you...this is the best $34 bucks I've ever spent.

Regards,
Brian

Matt _____ a Maryland driver and government official with an Ohio speeding ticket asked that his last name be withheld. He wrote the following detailed testimonial of his experience detailing what was going to happen with or without TicketKiller and with or without an attorney. Matt writes:

Thank you for your well organized packet. The combination of the officer not showing due to my motion for continuation, the speed survey (even though it was a state max case), and case law, forced the State Prosecutor to amend the charge to a simple non moving headlight fine even with the officer still not showing up. Before Ticketkiller: 78mph in a 65mph zone, $100 fine, 2 points, insurance hike when conviction transferred to home state, facing the violation of an already existing in-state Probation Before Judgment which would have resulted in 2 more points being added to my record...

Court with Lawyer: contacted lawyers in the area of my out of state ticket and was advised of retainer fees ranging from $125 to $225 an hour... no guarantee... possible plea, however conviction was basically assumed, just a reduction of speed and fees with added court costs...Court WITH Ticketkiller: State Prosecutor negotiated a NON-MOVING violation based on how prepared I was, lack of Discovery Information furnished prior to case, presence of DOT statement that no speed engineering survey was executed on the stretch of road I was fined on, presence of DOT speed survey of similar roadway showing 85% speed was near 78 mph so, though state max is 65mph, made the prima facie speed limit almost 15mph out of range...

Result: $30 fine, court cost, no points, no PBJ violation, slept great last night...

Thanks Ticketkiller, I will refer. You've got me wanting to be a lawyer now!!!

Matt _____- MD Driver, ticket in Ohio

(I hold a government position so please use my testimonial if you should see fit however withhold my last name for security purposes-Thank you)

Jim Warness of Michigan writes:

I purchased your radar plus and studied it very well. I appeared in court and was the last customer the judge had. When it came to my time, the citing officer had not shown. At least an hour late. The Judge kindly dismissed my case. Cool, I thought. Haha, they give me a ticket for parking. Ten bucks and I paid it. Tired of the four hour turn to court and another four hours back plus a couple of hours waiting. Hopefully I'll get patted in the face with a spade before I gets the next ticket, but if I am still vertical I will purchase your se3rvices again, I saw a bunch of weak excuses and none of them flew. Thanks again.

Jim Warness

Larry of Illinois writes:

Hi Mike,

After 10 months of fighting, two courtrooms, three prosecutors and three different Judges, I received my Not Guilty decision in the mail yesterday. The Town aggressively pursued a guilty verdict against me but I won using your material.

Thanks
Larry

Ginger (last name withheld on request) of Alpharetta Georgia did not win but got her ticket reduced to where it will not go on her driving or insurance record. She writes:

Mike,

Just wanted to send you an update on where my case stands and to thank you for your product. I did become one of the "sheep" and ended up paying the fine, BUT thanks to your information, I felt much more confident and knowledgeable about the process.

You were right when you wrote "you are about to embark on an adventure" - the state obviously did not follow MUTCD rules as evidenced by how much difficulty I encountered trying to get the speed survey. They said an accurate one hadn't been done since the 1960's! And I had to schedule an appointment to come copy the file myself, etc. etc. I am but one person and since time is money and the government has much more time than I in the end it was in my best interest to handle as expeditiously as possible.

All things considered, I still count this as a success. Due to your information I was able to keep my driving record clean by having the ticket reduced to the less than 14 mph over limit that GA does not report.

Thanks for your help and best wishes! Feel free to use my comments in promoting your product - I only ask that you do not use my last name.

Ginger

Larry Lemay of New Hampshire won his case and more. He writes:

Dear Mike,

Thought you'd might like to know that I just got off the phone with a legislator from my district who's excited by what I shared with him regarding "speed traps" and wants to enact legislation ASAP against speed traps in my home State of N.H.

I am planning on meeting with a group of them in a few weeks to fill them in with what I have learned from purchasing ticket killer/case law and hopefully by this time next year, N.H., will have laws against speed traps.

It was what I learned from purchasing your package earlier this year that inspired me to seek this legislation. It also gave me everything I needed for a not guilty finding in district court to the charge of speeding 53 mph in a 30 mph speed trap. I literally blew the prosecution away in court using the information from your package.

Thanks again,
Larry Lemay

James Wolfe of California wrote:

Hi Mike,

I just wanted to thank you for the service you provide. I chose to fight my ticket through a trial by declaration, as it was the least taxing on my schedule and it gives me a second try if the ticket was not dismissed. I utilized the basic framework from your example addressing the radar issues and fashioned it to suit my situation. I just found out today that my ticket was, in fact, dismissed. The information you provided is a great resource. Hopefully I will not need to use it again but if I do get a ticket in the future I feel confident that I will be able to have it dismissed as well.

Thanks again,
James

Eric Henninger of New York was about to lose his license. He wrote:

I just have to say, your program is wonderful. I went into court with the MUTCD in hand and asked for a dismissal with my first words. They granted it and I left. It was wonderful. I was dressed appropriately, as if I knew what I was talking about and was very confident. This one meant the world to me because i would have lost my license. I can't thank you enough for giving me the knowledge that you did. The best part about the whole thing: NYS will be moving to the MUTCD instead of the NY supplement very soon. What does that mean for you? Well, a lot more cases will be able to be won with this system. I think you should use that to your advantage. I really appreciate what you do to give the public an edge.

Eric Henninger

Mike Veges in Pittsburg Pennsylvania beat his first ticket in PA and dropped us a note asking for info on beating a second ticket. Mark writes:

I have successfully used your service in the past. However, my wife got her FIRST ticket recently when the Pittsburgh, PA police used INRADD laser timing device. Could you tell me how I might successfully defend this? I know radar is illegal for non-state police in PA, but the laser timing thing is new.

Thanks,Mike